I've always fancied MobilityOne (MBO) ever since that fateful week in January 2015 when the stock bounced off it's 52 week low, ending the month more than 100% higher. What follows is a breakdown of the key indicators.
REVENUE
The long
term trend looks positive, demonstrating consecutive revenue growth
every six months in all but three of the fifteen HY periods assessed.
The company explored new avenues in the wake of the financial crisis and
managed to mitigate the slowdown in the global economy.
GROSS PROFIT
MobilityOne's revenue stream has been growing from strength to strength but what of it's profits? Are the company products and the way in which it trades generating profits if any? I've compiled the figures for revenue and the gross profits during each of the 6 month period since 2008. What the chart shows is a parallel correlation between the revenue and the gross profit booked. The chart figures are in (GBP) millions, with the left-side measuring revenue and the right-side gross profit. As revenue has increased so has gross profits.
We should also take into account that the value of the MYR against the GBP (in which the accounts are reported) increased from 2008 up until 2010 rather quickly and remained stable until around mid 2013 before it began to lose value. Gross profits appeared stronger perhaps in part to the stronger currency exchange. More recently the MYR has lost purchasing power against the GBP and we saw that reflected in weaker gross profits despite record revenues in the first half of 2015. The second half results may suffer as a result of the extreme currency fluctuation during the latter half of the year. However since the start of the year the MYR has strengthened and regained some its losses which should reflect well in the first half 2016 results to be released in September.
NET PROFIT
The company have had a mixed performance in recent years, struggling to keep above water in some periods, but now appear to be on a stable growth platform. The loss booked in H213 was particularly bad due to the write-down of loss-making assets the company disposed of following a policy shift towards domestic trade. They also suffered from impairments in the first half of 2014 which impacted profits. During slower periods MBO have accessed loan facilities and received the support from Directors through in-house loans providing cheap access to finance. They have had no problems in paying down these facilities as will be illustrated a little later.
Operating profits are often squeezed due to the high cost of sales involved, continuing product research & development and previous expansion into emerging markets. The latter factor in particular has drained positive net cash-flow in an effort to expand into new territories, specifically Indonesia, Cambodia and the Philippines. The company have now disposed of their loss-making ventures and written down assets, stripping out excessive waste and are beginning to gain traction in the domestic market with operating profits booked in the past three periods.
ASSETS & LIABILITIES
The assets & liabilities make very interesting reading and I would encourage those interested to check out the FY 2013 accounts in order to understand the reasons why Net Assets fell considerably in the second half of 2013. The charts below show Net Assets fell considerably and have held around the same level for two years. Net Current Assets held have occasionally dipped into negative territory however more recently appear to be strengthening towards levels last seen in 2008-09.
This chart better illustrates the Net Current Asset position. The value of net current assets is often the preferred indicator of company health as it deals with working capital and other measures that affect the company's short-term financial health. Whilst net assets have suffered in the past due to writedowns the company has boosted it's short term net capacity. More on this later.
Here's the growing Net Current Asset value over the Net Asset position which appears to have bottomed. Fundamentally, Net Assets shouldn't suffer another shock as the value attributed to such has been much reduced. Add to this the company recently sunk £330k into purchasing new headquarters in Kuala Lumpar which is a hard asset. The Net Asset position doesn't reflect the impressive growth the company has experienced nor the increasing current asset position away from non-current assets. In June 2008 current assets were worth just £1.55m and by June 2015 they were worth almost £4.0m!
NET CASH / DEBT
Cash held on the balance sheet at the end of each 6 month period has increased steadily for the most part besides H113. A steady trend upwards. The amount of debt held fluctuates as the company draws down on short-term loans and repays when it is due. Net debt peaked in the second half of 2011 at more than twice the total cash held. Since then Net debt fell to £442k in the first half of 2014. It shot higher in the second half of the year owing to a property purchase, increasing receivables and short term loans to cover the cash-flow. Crucially we saw a huge reduction in net debt over 6 months from £1,443,112 at H2 2014 to £734,128 today!
The chart suggests the BoD have a 'cash-retention' policy where possible to increase the amount held at every half year interval. This has it's benefits, providing easy means of cash-flow and shoring up current accounts. It also looks healthy on the balance sheets. We can also deduce that the company prefer to use free cash-flow to reduce loans rather than significantly increase the sums of cash held. The company has a large trading account surplus and inventories to boot which fluctuate according to demand and are partly responsible for the net debt swings.
INVENTORIES & TRADE RECEIVABLES (ITOR) vs TRADE & OTHER PAYABLES (TOP)
If we focus on the non-cash current assets it's clear again that the scale of the company operations have increased significantly over the past 7 years. Inventories made up a greater proportion of ITOR in 2008 but due to lack of trade the company had relatively little Trade & Other Receivables due. But the trend began to improve in 2010 about the time loans increased and Net Debt also. ITOR peaked in H1 2011 whilst Net Debt peaked in the second half of the year. Inventories have since then been depleted whilst cash has continued to increase on the balance sheet. We saw one anomaly in H214 as loans increased and Net Debt also reversed it's falling trend. At this time the company took out a loan for the new headquarters in Kuala Lumpar. It also appears that Trade & Other Receivables spiked up at the same time which was unfortunate, most probably a series of late or due payments resulting from the company changing it's growth policy to domestic markets. Results in H1 2015 showed this to be an anomaly as Net Debt fell at the fastest pace on record helped by a strong operational performance and the collection of Trade and Other Receivables.
This chart shows a clear correlation between the Inventories & Trade Receivables less the Trade and Other Payables (we will call this Net ITOR) in comparison with the Net Debt position over the past 7 years. What we see are clear parallels between a rising Net ITOR and a rising Net Debt position. We know that because the greater proportion of ITOR has been receivables due rather than stocking up on inventory, the company has financed cash-flow through short term loans (expanding Net Debt). What the chart doesn't illustrate is that as both Net ITOR and Net Debt have fallen in tandem, the balance sheet has actually expanded. The company are moving towards Net cash and an even ITOR/TOP balance. I would hope to see a Net Cash position in the coming years.
NET OPERATING CASH-FLOW
Net Operating Cash-Flow is what the company generates from it's operations after interest among other things. Crucially it does not included Finance and Investing cash-flow, such income and expenditure like the purchase of property and the draw-down of a loan. This is purely an operational performance indicator. It is normal for it to fluctuate between each half. What the figures show is that operations were loss making for about 4 years but have since performed well aside from in 2014. Net Current Assets and Net cash-flow from operations were at their highest point since 2009.
INVESTMENT CASE
I'm keen to reiterate this company are valued at £2.5 million on AIM. The markets should in theory forward value the company earnings and trading outlook. Instead this stock has been left largely ignored since June-July 2015. There was a large bounce on increased trading in January 2015 but otherwise volumes in general have been poor ever since November 2013.
If you take the operating profit figures it correlates well with the falling share-price over this period. More recently we have seen a return to profits but as yet this hasn't been reflected in the market value. The ringgits devaluation and general market weakening since the Autumn 2015 has kept investors at bay. Small-caps have suffered greatly. High growth countries such as Malaysia and its neigbours should do well in the coming decade compared to the ailing US whose economy is plagued with all manner of social and economic issues. Europe is an even greater concern.
More to the point, I would choose long established companies such as MBO that are largely ignored by investors, have only recently begun to report significant amounts of profit (in comparison to their market value) and are cash positive or are moving quickly towards it. Whilst MBO has seen it's net asset position (in particular non-current assets) fall as a result of failed ventures abroad it has responded well looking to capitalise on domestic share and expand its business through profitable trade. As a result, operating profits are improving, free cash is reducing the net debt position very quickly and the company are in a position to boost revenues through existing market places. I expect this trend to continue and will gain market recognition in the coming years.
